Development of a University-Government Partnership for Public Health Response and Workforce Development in the State of Oregon.

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed and exacerbated a public health workforce shortage and national strategies have called for the development of clear occupational pathways for students to enter the public health workforce and meaningful public health careers. In response to the immediate need for public health workers during the pandemic, several universities and academic hospitals rapidly mobilized students and employees and partnered with local or state health departments. However, many of those partnerships were based on short-term volunteer effort to support critical COVID-19 public health efforts. In this article, we document the development of Oregon's Public Health Practice Team, a student, staff, and faculty workforce developed at the Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University (OHSU-PSU) School of Public Health in close collaboration with the Oregon Health Authority (OHA). This project contributed significant effort to several phases of Oregon's statewide public health response to COVID-19, and over time developed into a lasting, multi-purpose, inter-agency collaborative public health practice program. Health equity has been centered at every stage of this work. We describe the phases of the partnership development, the current team structure and operations, and highlight key challenges and lessons learned. This provides a case-study of how an innovative and flexible university-government partnership can contribute to immediate pandemic response needs, and also support ongoing public health responses to emerging needs, while contributing to the development of a skilled and diverse public health workforce.

Evaluation of Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease Treatment Completion and Adherence to ATS/IDSA Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacteria are environmental organisms that cause infections leading to chronic, debilitating pulmonary disease, among which Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is the most common species. METHODS: We described patterns of macrolide-based multidrug antibiotic therapies for MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) in US Medicare beneficiaries with bronchiectasis between January 2006 and December 2014. MAC therapy was defined as a multidrug regimen containing a macrolide plus ≥1 other drug targeting MAC-PD (rifamycin, ethambutol, fluoroquinolone, or amikacin) prescribed concomitantly for >28 days. RESULTS: We identified 9189 new MAC therapy users, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 74 (6 years) at the start of therapy; 75% female and 87% non-Hispanic white. A guideline-based regimen (a macrolide, ethambutol, and rifamycin, with or without amikacin) was prescribed for 51% of new MAC therapy users at treatment start, of whom 41% were continuing guideline-based therapy at 6 months, and only 18% at 12 months. Of all new MAC therapy users, by 18 months only 11% were still receiving MAC treatment, 55% had discontinued therapy, and 34% were censored owing to death or the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, nearly half of new MAC therapy users were prescribed a non-guideline-recommended macrolide-based therapy, including regimens commonly associated with promoting macrolide resistance. Treatment discontinuation was common, and once discontinued, only a few beneficiaries resumed therapy at a later time. Our study adds important data to the current literature on treatment patterns for MAC-PD among older US populations. Future research should examine treatment patterns using more contemporary data sources.

Validity of Diagnosis Code-Based Claims to Identify Pulmonary NTM Disease in Bronchiectasis Patients.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria infection is increasing in incidence and can lead to chronic, debilitating pulmonary disease. We investigated the accuracy of diagnosis code-based nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease claims among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. We observed that these claims have moderate validity, but given their low sensitivity, incidence might be underestimated.

Initiation of anti-TNF therapy and the risk of optic neuritis: from the safety assessment of biologic ThERapy (SABER) Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of optic neuritis (ON) in patients using anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. METHODS: We identified new users of anti-TNF therapy (etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab) or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) during 2000-2007 from the following data sources: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly, Tennessee Medicaid, and National Medicaid/Medicare. Within this cohort, we used validated algorithms to identify ON cases occurring after onset of new drug exposure. We then calculated and compared ON incidence rates between exposure groups. RESULTS: We identified 61 227 eligible inflammatory disease patients with either new anti-TNF or new nonbiologic DMARD use. Among this cohort, we found 3 ON cases among anti-TNF new users, occurring a median of 123 days (range, 37-221 days) after anti-TNF start. The crude incidence rate of ON across all disease indications among anti-TNF new users was 10.4 (95% CI 3.3-32.2) cases per 100 000 person-years. In a sensitivity analysis considering current or past anti-TNF or DMARD use, we identified a total of 6 ON cases: 3 among anti-TNF users and 3 among DMARD users. Crude ON rates were similar among anti-TNF and DMARD groups: 4.5 (95% CI 1.4-13.8) and 5.4 (95% CI 1.7-16.6) per 100 000 person-years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Optic neuritis is rare among those who initiate anti-TNF therapy and occurs with similar frequency among those with nonbiologic DMARD exposure.